New Hp Envy 2017 17 Inch 8 Gen I7 Review
HP Envy 17-cg1356 review: A large multimedia laptop ↺
17 inches with the MX450. With its 17-inch display, the HP Envy 17 is well-suited for the consumption of media contents, as well every bit for simple games and function tasks. An Intel Core i5-1135G7 and Nvidia'southward GeForce MX450 are supposed to evangelize sufficient performance for this. Our review shows how well this works out.
Most one year agone, nosotros already saw the Green-eyed 17 with the model number cg0710ng in one of our tests. While our overall impression was fairly good, simply the cost seemed too high in our opinion. Now the HP Envy 17-cg1356ng is available for aroundgrand Euros (~$1171), which is about 500 Euros (~$586) less. It is equipped with an Intel Core i5-1135G7, an Nvidia GeForce MX450, 16 GB of RAM, and a 1-TB SSD.
With this hardware, the 17-inch laptop competes against the laptops from the competitors listed below. You can besides add together more devices from our database below each of the sections.
Processor
Intel Core i5-1135G7 4 x 2.4 - 4.2 GHz, 46 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25.5 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake UP3
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 - 2048 MB, Core: 1575 MHz, Memory: 1751 MHz, NVIDIA 462.80, Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EUs
Display
17.30 inch xvi:9, 1920 10 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics AUO439D, IPS, sleeky: yes
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Weight
2.73 kg ( = 96.iii oz / vi.02 pounds), Power Supply: 300 chiliad ( = 10.58 oz / 0.66 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
HP has manufactured the example of the Green-eyed 17 cg1356ng from aluminum, which ensures that the laptop is very robust and resistant to warping. Information technology is besides not prone to hands testify fingerprints. Notwithstanding, the same doesn't get for the display, since this is covered by glass. In addition, the opening angle is fairly small at just about 120 degrees. To open the lid you too need both hands, since the hinges are fairly hard to motion and otherwise the base unit is lifted up as well.
At a weight of slightly more than 2.7 kg (~6 lb), the HP laptop is a relatively heavy device. With the large, 17-inch display, the size of the laptop also turns out a flake larger.
❌
Although HP forgoes a Thunderbolt connection in the Envy 17, the available Type-C port supports image output via DisplayPort. The residual of the connections are standard. There is no Ethernet connection.
Using our AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60 reference storage card, the card reader of the Green-eyed 17 cg1356ng achieves speeds of 74 MB/s when copying and 83.9 MB/due south when reading data. The values are good enough, if unremarkable.
The HP Envy 17 cg1356ng is able to connect wirelessly via Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6. With our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router, it reaches average speeds of 1418 Mbit/south when transferring information and 1548 Mbit/s when receiving. These are very good results that are sufficient for one of the summit places in our examination field.
HP Envy 17-cg Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1548 (1357-1709)
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 grand 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf iii.ane.3: Ø1453 (1291-1633)
HP Envy 17-cg Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Customer (transmit) ane m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf three.1.3: Ø1394 (731-1508)
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Customer (transmit) 1 yard 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1395 (698-1497)
As most other manufacturers, HP likewise just uses a depression-resolution webcam with 0.nine MP in its laptop. The image quality is correspondingly mediocre, displaying objects blurry fifty-fifty in adept low-cal weather and showing colors that are too pale.
The HP Envy 17 cg1356ng can be unlocked using a fingerprint sensor, which is positioned next to the right Alt primal. In our test, the sensor responded well to stored fingerprints, reliably unlocking the laptop.
The box of the HP laptop only contains the laptop itself and the respective power supply. You tin social club additional generic accessories from the manufacturer's website.
The HP Envy 17 cg1356ng should be able to offer some good maintenance options, if only it wouldn't exist so difficult to open. In order to remove all the screws from the lesser, you first take to remove ii glued-on rubber bands. Subsequently the screws accept been removed, the bottom of the case is held very tightly in place by some clamps.
However, after you accept finally been able to loosen the clamps, you lot get admission to the SSD, the two RAM slots, the WLAN module, a slot for a two.v-inch bulldoze, and the screwed-in bombardment.
HP offers a 24-calendar month warranty period for the Green-eyed 17 cg1356ng. This can be expanded at an boosted cost, for instance 3 years with pickup and return service for about 96 Euros (~$112).
Keyboard
The keys of the Green-eyed 17 provide a good grip on the fingertips and clear feedback with a rather soft pressure level point when typing. Subsequently a short period of getting used to the latter, fifty-fifty longer typing tasks are easily possible. Due to the large format, most of the keys are arranged so they each occupy a single space, and simply the arrow upward and arrow downward keys turn out slightly too small-scale.
As mouse replacement, HP uses a ClickPad that is well-suited for navigating the mouse pointer. The surface offers only very little resistance to the finger tips, easily enabling drag-and-drop movements without any issues. Mouse clicks can be triggered reliably either by clicking the pad or by touching it.
The display of the Envy 17 cg1356ng consists of a big, 17.three-inch IPS console with a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. At 349 cd/m², the brightness is relatively high and is only surpassed in our test field past the Dell XPS 17 9700. At 89%, the brightness distribution is besides good.
HP does not use PWM for brightness control, which should be helpful for persons with sensitive eyes. Other display models are not offered.
330 cd/m² | 349 cd/grand² | 330 cd/m² | ||
313 cd/m² | 347 cd/m² | 323 cd/chiliad² | ||
311 cd/1000² | 330 cd/m² | 327 cd/grand² | ||
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics AUO439D
X-Rite i1Pro two
Maximum: 349 cd/1000² (Nits) Average: 328.9 cd/yard² Minimum: 13.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Middle on Battery: 295 cd/m²
Contrast: 1285:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/k²)
ΔE Colour three.75 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.four
ΔE Greyscale 4.88 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll two.2.0 3D)
95% sRGB (Argyll 2.two.0 3D)
68% Brandish P3 (Argyll 2.two.0 3D)
Gamma: ii.53
HP Green-eyed 17-cg AU Optronics AUO439D, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE AU Optronics B173HAN04.3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.thirty | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 BOE084E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.thirty | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H SHP14D7, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brandish | two% | -twoscore% | 10% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68 | 68.5 1% | 39.98 -41% | 77.4 14% |
sRGB Coverage | 95 | 97.1 2% | 59.3 -38% | 100 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69 | seventy.1 2% | 41.three -40% | 76.half-dozen eleven% |
Response Times | 5% | 69% | -38% | |
Response Fourth dimension Grey l% / Grey lxxx% * | 40 ? | 39 ? 2% | xiv ? 65% | threescore.4 ? -51% |
Response Time Blackness / White * | thirty ? | 28 ? 7% | eight ? 73% | 37.6 ? -25% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | |||
Screen | 2% | -6% | 41% | |
Brightness heart | 347 | 330 -5% | 321 -seven% | 636 83% |
Effulgence | 329 | 309 -half-dozen% | 282 -14% | 580 76% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -ane% | 81 -9% | 86 -three% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.33 -22% | 0.36 -33% | 0.34 -26% |
Contrast | 1285 | 1000 -22% | 892 -31% | 1871 46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.75 | 2.82 25% | iv.3 -fifteen% | 2.4 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.53 | 6.27 17% | 7.1 6% | iii.5 54% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.88 | 3.58 27% | two.26 54% | two 59% |
Gamma | two.53 87% | two.42 91% | 2.36 93% | 2.08 106% |
CCT | 6624 98% | 6994 93% | 6650 98% | 6704 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 38 | 67.5 | |
Color Infinite (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 59 | 100 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | i.v | |||
Total Boilerplate (Program / Settings) | 3% / 2% | viii% / -2% | iv% / 21% |
* ... smaller is better
While the HP Envy 17 cg1356ng places second in our test field with its good contrast ratio of 1285:one, the very practiced black value of 0.27 cd/m² is sufficient for kickoff place among our selected comparing devices.
The CalMAN analysis likewise shows that the colors are reproduced fairly balanced already in the country of commitment. However,with aDeltaE valueof four.88, the colour deviation is still slightly elevated.
Due to its glossy surface, the display of the Green-eyed 17 is very cogitating. Despite the effulgence value that is really quite good, image content was hard to read outdoors. There will exist some reflections of the environment eastven in shady places.
Display Response Times
ℹ
Brandish response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
xxx ms ... ascent ↗ and autumn ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 13 ms autumn | ||
The screen shows irksome response rates in our tests and volition be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are improve. This means that the measured response fourth dimension is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Fourth dimension 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... ascent ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows irksome response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method chosen Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human middle. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do non use PWM to dim the brandish. If PWM was detected, an average of 22039 (minimum: five - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
The viewing angles of the IPS panel used here past HP are very stable. Paradigm contents can also exist viewed from very steep angles, without there existence distortions or distorted colors.
HP targets the Envy 17 not merely for multimedia applications just also offers information technology as an office laptop. Correspondingly, there are also configurations with a more powerful CPU or without the dedicated graphics card that is built into our test unit of measurement. The equipment for the working memory and storage solution also varies. Prices autumn between 850 and 1600 Euros (~$996 - $1874), with our test unit belonging to the more affordable equipment models at around chiliad Euros (~$1171).
The Intel Core i5-1135G7 used hither is a quad-core processor that belongs to Intel'south Tiger Lake generation. The clock speeds range between 2.iv and 4.2 GHz, with the duration how long those can be maintained depending on the cooling system and the configured TDP. With a long-term PL1 of 25.v watts and curt-term PL2 of 46 watts, the TDP falls in the middle range of the possible configuration options.
In our Cinebench R15 constant load test, the operation starts out at the level of the actually more powerful Intel Core i7-1165G7 in the Acer Aspire v A517, but and then drops fairly quickly, leveling out at a value that is about 10% lower. This result is also confirmed in the unmarried tests, meaning that the Envy 17 cg1356ng is able to place in the eye of our test field overall.
Y'all tin can find out most the performance to expect from boosted laptops in comparison in our CPU benchmark list.
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average of form Multimedia (819 - 1940, n=74, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1062 - 1373, n=44) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3121 - 18373, n=79, final 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire v A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Cadre i5-1135G7 (2786 - 6136, n=46) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Unmarried Core) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (375 - 527, northward=53) | |
Boilerplate of class Multimedia (311 - 739, due north=100, concluding ii years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (727 - 7040, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (979 - 2382, north=53) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Boilerplate of grade Multimedia (119 - 279, n=96, terminal ii years) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (159 - 205, northward=52) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Boilerplate of class Multimedia (334 - 2786, due north=114, concluding 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire five A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (431 - 925, northward=56) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Average Intel Cadre i5-1135G7 (499 - 1044, n=51) | |
HP Green-eyed 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Boilerplate of form Multimedia (183.3 - 1439, n=98, last 2 years) | |
7-Nothing 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2898 - 6186, north=97, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3924 - 4921, n=53) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
vii-Nothing xviii.03 / 7z b iv | |
Boilerplate of class Multimedia (8984 - 72912, due north=97, final 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (14745 - 24873, n=53) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Unmarried-Core Score | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
HP Green-eyed 17-cg | |
Average of class Multimedia (813 - 1887, northward=99, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1147 - 1428, n=49) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Geekbench five.three / 64 Flake Multi-Cadre Score | |
Boilerplate of class Multimedia (1604 - 13925, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3475 - 5472, n=49) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
HWBOT x265 Criterion v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Boilerplate of class Multimedia (1.39 - 21, n=97, last two years) | |
Acer Aspire five A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (three.57 - 7.half dozen, n=48) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Boilerplate of class Multimedia (30.2 - 99.2, north=95, terminal 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Average Intel Cadre i5-1135G7 (44.ii - 61.8, northward=51) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
R Criterion ii.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (0.619 - 0.727, n=50) | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.4155 - 1.002, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire five A517-52G-79Z5 | |
* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
848 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
120 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Unmarried 64Bit
199 Points
Assist
In the PCMark ten examination to evaluate the system operation, the HP Envy 17 cg1356ng achieves second identify in our test field. In the single disciplines, particularly the outcome of the "Digital Content Creation" stands out, with the HP laptop leading the field of all the other selected comparison devices hither. In everyday performance, the laptop always runs smoothly without showing whatsoever micro stutters. Starting applications and accessing information succeeds smoothly and quickly.
PCMark x / Score | |
Acer Aspire v A517-52G-79Z5 | |
HP Green-eyed 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3028 - 7816, north=82, concluding 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Average of grade Multimedia (6441 - 10945, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Boilerplate Intel Cadre i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
PCMark x / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire v A517-52G-79Z5 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Boilerplate Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
Average of grade Multimedia (5448 - 10050, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of grade Multimedia (2148 - 11777, northward=82, final ii years) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
Acer Aspire five A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5196 points | |
Help |
In the examination with LatencyMon, our test configuration of the HP laptop shows increased latencies, which make it unsuited for real-fourth dimension applications.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
* ... smaller is better
HP has equipped the Green-eyed 17 with a Samsung PM991 SSD that achieves very good read and write rates in the storage benchmarks. With this, information technology is at the level of comparable storage solutions, placing third in our test field, but behind the Lenovo V17-IIL.
You can find out what performance to expect from other storage solutions in our HDD/SSD benchmark list.
HP Green-eyed 17-cg Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Boilerplate Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / vi | 2% | 44% | -1% | ten% | |
Write 4K | 137.5 | 170.five 24% | 242.two 76% | 106.9 -22% | 142 ? 3% |
Read 4K | 38.26 | 56.v 48% | 51.6 35% | 41.49 8% | 43.2 ? thirteen% |
Write Seq | 1283 | 847 -34% | 1970 54% | 1025 -20% | 1401 ? 9% |
Read Seq | 1349 | 1168 -13% | 2010 49% | 1429 6% | 1583 ? 17% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 381.3 | 449.eight eighteen% | 579 52% | 342.viii -10% | 437 ? 15% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 398 | 489.3 23% | 673 69% | 364.2 -8% | 495 ? 24% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1654 | 1034 -37% | 1976 nineteen% | 1714 4% | 1607 ? -3% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2386 | 2123 -11% | 2420 1% | 3205 34% | 2500 ? 5% |
AS SSD | -22% | 12% | -7% | -5% | |
Seq Read | 1961 | 1734 -12% | 2217 13% | 2424 24% | 2124 ? 8% |
Seq Write | 954 | 911 -5% | 1920 101% | 1159 21% | 1282 ? 34% |
4K Read | 48.32 | 50.7 5% | 31.52 -35% | 34.68 -28% | 42.5 ? -12% |
4K Write | 131.4 | 134.5 ii% | 215.3 64% | 101.7 -23% | 137.5 ? 5% |
4K-64 Read | 1021 | 467.v -54% | 301.4 -70% | 985 -iv% | 981 ? -4% |
4K-64 Write | 883 | 706 -twenty% | 1395 58% | 956 8% | 763 ? -14% |
Admission Time Read * | 0.072 | 0.117 -63% | 0.052 28% | 0.116 -61% | 0.0766 ? -half dozen% |
Access Time Write * | 0.029 | 0.028 3% | 0.035 -21% | 0.036 -24% | 0.04317 ? -49% |
Score Read | 1266 | 692 -45% | 555 -56% | 1262 0% | 1236 ? -2% |
Score Write | 1110 | 932 -xvi% | 1802 62% | 1173 half dozen% | 1029 ? -7% |
Score Total | 2982 | 1954 -34% | 2635 -12% | 3020 ane% | 2862 ? -4% |
Full Average (Program / Settings) | -10% / -12% | 28% / 26% | -iv% / -5% | 3% / ii% |
* ... smaller is ameliorate
CDM v/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2386 MB/s
CDM 5/half-dozen Write Seq Q32T1: 1654 MB/s
CDM 5/vi Read 4K Q32T1: 398 MB/s
CDM 5/vi Write 4K Q32T1: 381.3 MB/southward
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1349 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1283 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 38.26 MB/southward
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 137.five MB/s
Sequential Read: 1961MB/s
Sequential Write: 954MB/s
Access Fourth dimension Read: 0.072ms
Admission Time Write: 0.029ms
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read: 2259MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write: 1621MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read: 1481MB/due south
DiskSpd seq_write: 1320MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read: 656MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write: 426MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read: 48.9MB/southward
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write: 141MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read: 2348MB/south
For the display of graphically more demanding image content, the Green-eyed 17 cg1356ng is equipped with an Nvidia GeForce MX450. This is suitable for 3D applications with medium demands on the graphics performance, allowing it to perform for instance video and image processing to some extent.
In the 3DMark benchmarks, the MX450 in the Envy 17 demonstrates a significant advantage compared to the internal graphics units in our examination field, and information technology is too able to surpass the Nvidia GeForce MX350 predecessor model. However, compared to other MX450 units, the performance of the GPU is below boilerplate. This is due to the fact that at that place are 4 versions of the MX450, all offering unlike performance levels, with the second-weakest version being used hither.
You can observe out about the performance offered past other graphics cards in our GPU benchmark list.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (1365 - 33856, north=84, terminal 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (6341 - 9580, northward=14) | |
HP Green-eyed 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire v A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of grade Multimedia (6498 - 87836, n=65, concluding 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (25467 - 33806, n=11) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire v A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Multimedia (920 - 25285, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (4336 - 5573, due north=15) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Boilerplate of class Multimedia (300 - 9746, n=83, terminal two years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1086 - 2300, northward=14) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7542 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14229 points | |
3DMark Burn Strike Score | 4254 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1204 points | |
Help |
Nvidia's GeForce MX450 is quite suited for gaming and is able to ensure smooth frame rates, every bit long as you are content with medium to low graphics settings. In the games we tested, smoothen gaming was also still possible in Full-HD resolution with this. However, current games such as "Cyberpunk 2077" require a significant reduction in the graphics settings and resolution in lodge to maintain frame rates higher up xxx fps.
Yous tin find out what performance to look in additional games in our GPU games list.
Dota ii Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average of class Multimedia (13.4 - 160, n=95, terminal 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (34.ix - 97.four, n=eighteen) | |
Acer Aspire five A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
X-Airplane eleven.eleven - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=three) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (35.four - 71.4, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (viii.55 - 108, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
With a dissonance level of upwardly to 46.vi dB(A), the fans of the Green-eyed 17 can become quite loud. But this is only rarely the case, and the HP laptop tin be considered a quiet laptop. While using office programs or surfing in the Internet, the fans generally remain turned off, then that the laptop is besides suited for noise sensitive environments.
We were unable to notice whatsoever other noises such equally coil whine.
Dissonance Level
Idle | 26 / 31.7 / dB(A) | |
HDD | 0 dB(A) | |
Load | 43.2 / 46.vi dB(A) | |
| ||
thirty dB xl dB(A) 50 dB(A) | ||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (xv cm distance) environment racket: 26 dB(A) |
According to our measurements, the surfaces of the Envy 17 can reach temperatures of up to 49.7 °C (~121°F) in our stress exam scenario, with the warmest point being at the bottom heart towards the back. At a maximum of 27 °C (81°F), the palm rests always stay inside a moderate temperature range. However, the stress test represents an extreme scenario, and the values should turn out significantly lower in everyday operation, so that y'all tin can always use the laptop on your lap without any problems.
During our constant stress test, the temperatures within the HP laptop briefly rose up to 93 °C (199°F). At this time, the clock speeds dropped to almost 400 MHz. Until the cease of the test, the cooling system was so able to stabilize them at an boilerplate value of 1.five GHz. Even though this is below the basic clock speed of 2.4 GHz, the organization could still be operated smoothly during this fourth dimension. Since a load such as in our stress exam is unlikely to occur in exercise, you don't have to await whatever limitations due to the temperatures being as well loftier.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum: 45.9 °C = 115 F Average: 34.3 °C = 94 F |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum: 49.7 °C = 121 F Average: 34.2 °C = 94 F |
Power Supply (max.) 54.iii °C = 130 F | Room Temperature 22.ii °C = 72 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum: 24.2 °C = 76 F Boilerplate: 23.2 °C = 74 F |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum: 24.viii °C = 77 F Average: 23.7 °C = 75 F |
Power Supply (max.) 28.3 °C = 83 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.ix °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats upwardly to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.ii °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than peel temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the bear upon.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest surface area of like devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).
The speakers of the HP Green-eyed 17 cg1356ng are able to produce a relatively loud book, offering a audio spectrum that emphasizes the higher frequencies. This makes them suited for reproducing voice content, for example, only for listening to media content or music, external speakers or headphones are recommended.
HP Envy 17-cg audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nigh no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is boilerplate (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.iv% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.iv% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% college than median
(+) | highs are linear (five.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - sixteen.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to aforementioned class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% like, nineteen% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was eighteen%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, viii% like, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, boilerplate was xx%, worst was 65%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is boilerplate (14.v% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.seven% abroad from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (seven.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | counterbalanced highs - only 2% abroad from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is boilerplate (xx.nine% difference to median)
Compared to same form
» 50% of all tested devices in this course were better, 13% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of vii%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of iii%, average was twenty%, worst was 65%
According to our measurements, the maximum ability consumption of the Envy 17 is 68 watts. At an boilerplate of nine.four watts in idle performance and 64.4 watts nether load, it is ane of the less efficient devices in our test field.
The included power supply is rated at 65 watts, so it is slightly likewise small.
HP Envy 17-cg i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.thirty | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 European union), Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.thirty | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.30 | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Boilerplate of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 12% | 8% | -five% | -5% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | three.viii | four.4 -16% | 4.1 -viii% | iii.7 3% | 4.75 ? -25% | six.09 ? -sixty% |
Idle Boilerplate * | nine.4 | 10 -half-dozen% | vii.viii 17% | 8.3 12% | viii.29 ? 12% | 10.8 ? -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.1 | eleven.seven -sixteen% | x 1% | 11.3 -12% | xi.1 ? -10% | 13.8 ? -37% |
Load Average * | 64.four | 47 27% | 44 32% | 58.1 ? x% | 66.nine ? -four% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 64.4 | 26.8 58% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 68 | 42 38% | 64.7 five% | 109 -60% | 75.ane ? -10% | 98.6 ? -45% |
* ... smaller is ameliorate
; Witcher three ultra: Ø64.iv (62.7-65.4)
; 1280x720 Prime95 28.x and Furmark 1.25: Ø68.two (67.5-68.eight)
In our realistic WLAN test, the HP laptop achieves a battery life of most 8 hours. In our exam field, only the Dell XPS 17 9700 accomplished a ameliorate issue, only that is likewise equipped with a larger battery.
Due to the support of quick charging, the 55.67-Wh bombardment is completely recharged after about 1.five hours.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 17h 43min | |
WiFi Websurfing | 7h 52min | |
Load (maximum brightness) | 1h 58min |
HP Envy 17-cg i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450, 55.67 Wh | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 European union), 42 Wh | Acer Aspire five A517-52G-79Z5 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 50.2 Wh | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bombardment Runtime | -22% | -v% | 48% | five% | |
Reader / Idle | 1063 | 827 -22% | 1169 ? 10% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 472 | 369 -22% | 441.four -6% | 912 93% | 546 ? sixteen% |
Load | 118 | 133 13% | 121 three% | 103.four ? -12% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 77 | 94.7 ? |
Pros
+ robust case
+ good input devices
+ skillful operation in everyday operation
+ skilful battery life
Cons
- very cogitating display
- throttles under very heavy load
- components within are hard to admission
- power-supply sized slightly likewise tight
In our test, the HP Green-eyed 17 cg1356ng shows itself as a well-performing laptop that is not simply able to handle extensive office tasks without any problems, merely whose graphics card also makes it suitable for applications with slightly elevated demands on the graphics performance. With this, you tin can comfortably perform some epitome and video processing tasks, and games are also playable smoothly at reduced graphics settings. The adept input devices besides contribute to the impression being practiced and then far.
The basically good impression of the well-performing HP Envy 17 cg1356ng is marred by the highly reflective display.
With its 17.3-inch screen, the display of the HP laptop is large enough to reproduce varied media content hands readable. The brightness would as well be sufficiently high, if it weren't for the reflective display. Not only does this make it difficult to recognize the image content outdoors, but some artificial light sources indoors can too hinder the view of the display, for case.
Those who are looking for a laptop with like equipment just a matte display will therefore perchance exist better served with the Acer Aspire five A517.
While the HP Envy 17 with the cg1356ng model label is available in Europe for case with a 512 GB SSD for 990 Euros from Amazon Germany, other similar configurations with the Nvidia MX450 are offered in the US nether dissimilar model designations for example from Amazon.
HP Envy 17-cg - 2021-08-14 08/xiv/2021 v7
Mike Wobker
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
Mike Wobker, 2021-08-xx (Update: 2021-09- ix)
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-Envy-17-cg1356ng-review-A-large-multimedia-laptop.555966.0.html
0 Response to "New Hp Envy 2017 17 Inch 8 Gen I7 Review"
Post a Comment